Participants additionally had been expected if they had ever involved in a number of tasks linked to lesbian, gay

Fundamental Demographic Traits and Other Background Factors

Details about respondents’ age, ethnicity and race, residence, location, and home structure have been regularly gathered by Knowledge Networks in previous questionnaires. The present study included a concern asking whether or not the respondent ended up being presently on active army responsibility, a part associated with the army Reserves or National Guard, or perhaps a veteran that is military.

Intimate Orientation Identification

As noted formerly, all participants had reported they certainly were homosexual, lesbian, or bisexual on a formerly administered KN questionnaire. The survey that is present by having a screening question that asked respondents “Which of this following most readily useful defines your sexual orientation?” and provided five choices arrayed for a continuum from homosexual to heterosexual. For male participants, your options had been (a) gay or homosexual; (b) bisexual, mostly interested in males; (c) bisexual, equally drawn to people; (d) bisexual, mostly interested in females; (e) heterosexual or straight. For females, the response that is first had been lesbian, homosexual, or homosexual, and choices (b) and (d) had been transposed.

Participants were expected how old they are if they first knew about their intimate orientation (“How old were you when you initially knew or decided you were ” that isgay/lesbian/bisexual and once they first disclosed it to a different individual (“How old were you the first occasion you told somebody else that you will be gay/lesbian/bisexual?”). They certainly were later expected whether their mother or father knew about their orientation that is sexual and if relevant, just how many of their siblings and brothers knew about any of it. In addition, employing a scale that ranged from 0 ( maybe not at all off to any one of them) to 7 (totally out to them all), participants reported the extent to that they had been “out of this wardrobe (openly L/G/B/Q/H)” to six extra teams: (1) “other family members maybe maybe not your instant family members,” (2) “your current heterosexual (‘straight’) buddies,” (3) “your casual acquaintances that are heterosexual (‘straight’),” (4) “heterosexual (‘straight’) buddies whom you knew you work with on a daily basis (other than your boss or supervisors) before you came out,” (5) “your boss and other supervisors at work,” and (6) “the people.” A “doesn’t apply to me” reaction choice had been included for every team.

Participants also had been expected whether or not they had ever involved with many different tasks pertaining to lesbian, gay, or bisexual problems, including general public expressions of viewpoint (“Wore a key, posted an indicator, or displayed a sticker” that is bumper; taking part in a rally, march, or demonstration; calling a federal federal government official; and adding cash up to a lesbian, gay, or bisexual company or cause. This a number of questions ended up being accompanied by a synchronous pair of things that asked perhaps the respondent had participated in identical activities for “a non gay problem or cause that is, one thing maybe not associated primarily to homosexual males, lesbians, or bisexuals. for contrast purposes”

Political and Spiritual Participation

Details about participants’ political party affiliation and ideology (liberal, moderate, conservative) have been previously gathered by Knowledge Networks. When it comes to current study, participants had been expected if they had voted when you look at the latest (2004) presidential election and, if that’s the case, which is why candidate. These were additionally expected for details about their spiritual denomination, regularity of attendance at spiritual solutions throughout the past 12 months, exactly just just how guidance that is much provides within their time to time living, and (for participants whom reported affiliation with a spiritual denomination and any attendance at spiritual solutions) the level to which their congregation includes lesbian, homosexual, and bisexual people.

Relationships, Marriage, and Family

Participants were expected their present relationship status, their legal marital status, and exactly how numerous kiddies they will have (including used young ones and stepchildren). Participants presently in a relationship (including those that were hitched) had been expected the gender of these partner. People who had been in a relationship although not hitched had been expected whether or not they had been cohabiting as well as the chance they might marry their partner if their state had been to permit exact same intercourse marriages (this conditional clause ended up being omitted for respondents in Massachusetts, really the only state where marrying a exact same intercourse partner had been appropriate during the time of information collection). People who weren’t presently in a relationship had been expected if they would someday like to marry.